Disaster

 

 
Train explosion in Iran
18 February 2004
328 people killed; 460 people injured
Brief Description

At approximately 4.00 a.m. local time, a total of 51 chemical rail cars broke free from the train that they were attached to and rolled down the track, derailing at the next station resulting in a number of chemical leaks and fires in the Iranian City of Neyshabur, in Khorasan province, some 400 miles east of Tehran.

Local emergency services (fire, police, and rescue) responded to the incident, along with local and state level officials. Reports indicate that several hours later, as response teams attempted to extinguish fires and contain the incident, a large explosion occurred causing widespread damage and casualties.

The explosion has reportedly resulted in some 328 deaths, approximately 460 injured, with many individuals still unaccounted for. Those killed by the blast reportedly include the local governor, mayor and fire chief, as well as many of fire and rescue workers whom were on site responding to the incident.

There has been damage (exact extent currently unknown) to 5 nearby villages, including Dehnow and Hashemabad, among others.

A team of experts are also determining the health hazards from the fumes, said Hassan Rasouli, governor of Khorasan province. Many residents have been complaining of severe sore throats.

The derailed cars contained a variety of chemicals including 17 cars of sulphur (a flammable solid), 6 tank cars of gasoline (highly flammable liquid), 7 cars of fertilizers (explosive when mixed with flammable liquids), and 10 cars of cotton wool. The explosion was severe enough to have been felt 70 km away.

The above information is based on CNN News, BBC News, AFP and mainly on the OCHA situation report number 1 which is available on the OCHA Internet Website at http://www.reliefweb.int/


Possible Causes

Although no actual official cause has been identified, the explosion could be attributed to pooling and mixing of incompatible chemicals that had leaked following the derailment, which were then exposed to heat from the subsequent fire, possibly resulting in the explosion.

The blast occurred after 51 train cars - laden with sulphur, gasoline (petrol), fertilizers and cotton wool - broke lose and rolled about 20km (12 miles) down the track.

The wagons derailed at Khayyam station near Neyshabur and caught fire at 0400 (0030 GMT) on Wednesday.

As firefighters were attempting to douse the flames - watched on by crowds of curious villagers and officials - the train exploded, at 0935 (0605GMT).

The blast was so powerful that local residents thought it was an earthquake - and Iranian seismologists recorded a quake of magnitude 3.6 at the time of the explosion.

The clay-home village of Dehnow, which was closest to the blast at about 550 metres away, was flattened and many villagers were believed to have been killed. The rest are thought to have been evacuated.

It is still unclear what caused the heavily-laden freight train to derail. The investigation is likely to focus on human error as the moderate earthquake, which had initially been blamed, occurred after the explosion.

The government ordered an immediate inquiry into the disaster and has demanded the results by Sunday. Officials want to know how the freight wagons, which were not attached to a locomotive, could have simply moved off down the line, eventually careering off the track and bursting into flames.

They are also demanding to know why the train - which was said to be on its way from central Asian countries to Iran's southern port of Bandar Abbas - was loaded with such a lethal combination of chemicals.

Historical Data on Transportation of Dangerous Goods

Transport Accidents and their Consequences

Year
Place
Description
Consequences
1978
Los Afaques, Spain
A tanker delivering propane to a camp site exploded 216 people died and another 200 were injured
1989
Ufa, Russia
Gas explosion under two trains More than 400 killed
1989
Alaska, USA
About 40 million litres of
crude oil spilled into the ocean from the supertanker Exxon Valdez
Massive environmental damage. Clean up cost over US$2 billion
1990
Bangkok, Thailand
A tanker carrying liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) crashed in Bangkok resulting in an LPG explosion 63 people killed, 90 injured
1996
Alberton, USA
A freight train derailed
releasing around 59,000 kilos of chlorine into the air and 64,000 litres of potassium hydroxide solution into the soil
One person died, 300 area residents were taken to hospital. 1000 people in Alberton and the surrounding area were evacuated and over 1000 m3 of soil were contaminated
1998
Kyrygyzstan
A truck transporting cyanide to a gold mine plunged off a bridge. Around 1800 kg of sodium cyanide were spilled into a river upstream of several villages Within days hundreds,
possibly thousands of people sought treatment at medical clinics
1998
Nigeria
A fire and explosion in a leaking fuel pipeline As many as 500 people are reported to have been killed with 32 communities being affected and farms and buildings destroyed
1999
France
8,000 tonnes of fuel oil escaped from the tanker, "Erika" 100 kilometres of coast were polluted. Many seabirds were trapped in the oil. The spill had major economic effects on fishing, oyster farming and tourism.


International Guidance

The UNEP TransAPELL handbook

TransAPELL takes APELL guidance beyond the risks associated with fixed facilities to include those arising from the shipping, distribution and transport of dangerous goods. Planning for risks arising from the transport of dangerous goods is just as necessary as for fixed facilities but even more complex, for the following reasons:

  • Transport routes - the "risk objects"in this context - normally have a considerable geographical extension. As an emergency can occur anywhere along the route, emergency planning must be very flexible..

  • For historical or practical reasons, many routes pass through densely populated areas, along river valleys or along the shores of inland lakes, etc. There may, therefore, be many threatened objects (people, property, the natural environment) in the vicinity of possible accident locations.

  • Hazard identification is more complex. Many hazardous materials are transported several times during their product lives. This means that, in most cases, planning has to cover a greater variety of hazardous materials than is the case for a fixed facility. When a transport emergency arises, there may well be delay in ascertaining what substances are involved.

  • The number of stakeholders is generally greater than for fixed installations. Transport industries, particularly the road haulage industry, typically involve a large number of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Many of these or other stakeholders may not have offices or other rep-resentation in communities concerned.

  • An accident involving dangerous goods may happen in transit through a community that does not have any fixed chemical installations. Its emergency services are, therefore, unlikely to be equipped or trained to tackle emergencies involving unfamiliar and possibly unidentified chemicals.

  • The population at large is likely to be more ignorant of the hazards and of how to act in an emergency. Nearby residents, people in private cars or passengers in halted trains could all be affected. It will be more difficult to produce and disseminate adequate public information.

The guidance in this Report is applicable to all land transport of dangerous goods by road, rail and pipeline, as well as to the handling of such goods at interfaces with other modes of transport, e.g. ports and airports. The guidance is intended to supplement the provisions of national and international law and regulations, not to replace or interfere with them.


International Guidelines, Acts and Regulations

UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods.
Model Regulations


The United Nations Model Regulations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods provide a basis for development of harmonized regulations for all modes of transport, in order to facilitate trade and the safe, efficient transport of hazardous materials. The UN Model Regulations is in its 13th edition and is the basis for most international, regional, national and modal transportation regulations. The UN Model Regulations enhance safety, improve enforcement capability, ease training requirements and enhance global trade and economic development. Safety is enhanced primarily because harmonized requirements simplify the complexity of the regulations, simplify training efforts, and decrease the likelihood of non-compliance. The Model Regulations provide economic benefits by eliminating the costs of complying with a multitude of differing national, regional and modal regulations. The UN Model Regulations facilitate compatibility between modal requirements so that a consignment may be transported by more than one mode without intermediate reclassification, marking, labeling or repackaging.

Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail - COTIF

The transport of passengers and goods by rail is subject to the provisions of the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail of 9 May 1990 (COTIF). This Convention has two Appendices, one dealing with the carriage of passengers (CIV Uniform Rules) and the other dealing with the carriage of goods (CIM Uniform Rules).

The Office of Hazardous Materials Safety

The Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, which is within the United States Department of Transportation's Research and Special Programs Administration, is responsible for coordinating a national safety program for the transportation of hazardous materials by air, rail, highway and water, where comprehensive guidance on the subject can be found.

Links and Sources

Relief web, part of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
AFP
BBC News
CNN News
UNEP Chemicals Programme
OECD Chemical Safety Department

If you want to send us your comments, please e-mail us at: apell@unep.fr