Train explosion
in Iran
18 February 2004
328 people killed; 460 people injured
Brief Description
At approximately 4.00 a.m. local time, a total
of 51 chemical rail cars broke free from the train that they were
attached to and rolled down the track, derailing at the next station
resulting in a number of chemical leaks and fires in the Iranian City
of Neyshabur, in Khorasan province, some 400 miles east of Tehran.
Local emergency services (fire, police, and rescue)
responded to the incident, along with local and state level officials.
Reports indicate that several hours later, as response teams attempted
to extinguish fires and contain the incident, a large explosion
occurred causing widespread damage and casualties.
The explosion has reportedly resulted in some
328 deaths, approximately 460 injured, with many individuals still
unaccounted for. Those killed by the blast reportedly include the
local governor, mayor and fire chief, as well as many of fire and
rescue workers whom were on site responding to the incident.
There has been damage (exact extent currently
unknown) to 5 nearby villages, including Dehnow and Hashemabad,
among others.
A team of experts are also determining the health
hazards from the fumes, said Hassan Rasouli, governor of Khorasan
province. Many residents have been complaining of severe sore throats.
The derailed cars contained a variety of chemicals
including 17 cars of sulphur (a flammable solid), 6 tank cars of
gasoline (highly flammable liquid), 7 cars of fertilizers (explosive
when mixed with flammable liquids), and 10 cars of cotton wool.
The explosion was severe enough to have been felt 70 km away.
The above information is based on CNN News,
BBC News, AFP and mainly on the OCHA situation report number 1 which
is available on the OCHA Internet Website at http://www.reliefweb.int/
Possible Causes
Although no actual official cause has been
identified, the explosion could be attributed to pooling and mixing
of incompatible chemicals that had leaked following the derailment,
which were then exposed to heat from the subsequent fire, possibly
resulting in the explosion.
The blast occurred after 51 train cars - laden
with sulphur, gasoline (petrol), fertilizers and cotton wool - broke
lose and rolled about 20km (12 miles) down the track.
The wagons derailed at Khayyam station near Neyshabur
and caught fire at 0400 (0030 GMT) on Wednesday.
As firefighters were attempting to douse the flames
- watched on by crowds of curious villagers and officials - the
train exploded, at 0935 (0605GMT).
The blast was so powerful that local residents
thought it was an earthquake - and Iranian seismologists recorded
a quake of magnitude 3.6 at the time of the explosion.
The clay-home village of Dehnow, which was closest
to the blast at about 550 metres away, was flattened and many villagers
were believed to have been killed. The rest are thought to have
been evacuated.
It is still unclear what caused the heavily-laden
freight train to derail. The investigation is likely to focus on
human error as the moderate earthquake, which had initially been
blamed, occurred after the explosion.
The government ordered an immediate inquiry into
the disaster and has demanded the results by Sunday. Officials want
to know how the freight wagons, which were not attached to a locomotive,
could have simply moved off down the line, eventually careering
off the track and bursting into flames.
They are also demanding to know why the train
- which was said to be on its way from central Asian countries to
Iran's southern port of Bandar Abbas - was loaded with such a lethal
combination of chemicals.
Historical Data on Transportation
of Dangerous Goods
Transport Accidents and their Consequences
|
1978
|
Los Afaques, Spain
|
A tanker delivering propane to a
camp site exploded |
216 people died and another 200
were injured |
|
1989
|
Ufa, Russia
|
Gas explosion under two trains |
More than 400 killed |
|
1989
|
Alaska, USA
|
About 40 million litres of
crude oil spilled into the ocean from the supertanker Exxon
Valdez |
Massive environmental damage. Clean
up cost over US$2 billion |
|
1990
|
Bangkok, Thailand
|
A tanker carrying liquefied petroleum
gas (LPG) crashed in Bangkok resulting in an LPG explosion |
63 people killed, 90 injured |
|
1996
|
Alberton, USA
|
A freight train derailed
releasing around 59,000 kilos of chlorine into the air and 64,000
litres of potassium hydroxide solution into the soil |
One person died, 300
area residents were taken to hospital. 1000 people in Alberton
and the surrounding area were evacuated and over 1000 m3 of
soil were contaminated |
|
1998
|
Kyrygyzstan
|
A truck transporting
cyanide to a gold mine plunged off a bridge. Around 1800 kg
of sodium cyanide were spilled into a river upstream of several
villages |
Within days hundreds,
possibly thousands of people sought treatment at medical clinics |
|
1998
|
Nigeria
|
A fire and explosion in a leaking
fuel pipeline |
As many as 500 people are reported
to have been killed with 32 communities being affected and farms
and buildings destroyed |
|
1999
|
France
|
8,000 tonnes of fuel oil escaped
from the tanker, "Erika" |
100 kilometres of coast were
polluted. Many seabirds were trapped in the oil. The spill had
major economic effects on fishing, oyster farming and tourism. |
International
Guidance
The UNEP TransAPELL handbook
TransAPELL
takes APELL guidance beyond the risks associated with fixed facilities
to include those arising from the shipping, distribution and transport
of dangerous goods. Planning for risks
arising from the transport of dangerous goods is just as necessary
as for fixed facilities but even more complex, for the
following reasons:
- Transport routes - the "risk objects"in
this context - normally have a considerable geographical extension.
As an emergency can occur anywhere along the route, emergency
planning must be very flexible..
- For historical or practical reasons,
many routes pass through densely populated areas, along river
valleys or along the shores of inland lakes, etc. There may, therefore,
be many threatened objects (people, property, the natural environment)
in the vicinity of possible accident locations.
- Hazard identification is more complex. Many
hazardous materials are transported several times during their
product lives. This means that, in most cases, planning has to
cover a greater variety of hazardous materials than is the case
for a fixed facility. When a transport emergency arises, there
may well be delay in ascertaining what substances are involved.
- The number of stakeholders is generally
greater than for fixed installations. Transport industries, particularly
the road haulage industry, typically involve a large number of
small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Many of these or other
stakeholders may not have offices or other rep-resentation in
communities concerned.
- An accident involving dangerous goods
may happen in transit through a community that does not have any
fixed chemical installations. Its emergency services are, therefore,
unlikely to be equipped or trained to tackle emergencies involving
unfamiliar and possibly unidentified chemicals.
- The population at large is likely to
be more ignorant of the hazards and of how to act in an emergency.
Nearby residents, people in private cars or passengers in halted
trains could all be affected. It will be more difficult to produce
and disseminate adequate public information.
The guidance in this Report is applicable to all
land transport of dangerous goods by road, rail and pipeline, as
well as to the handling of such goods at interfaces with other modes
of transport, e.g. ports and airports. The guidance is intended
to supplement the provisions of national and international law and
regulations, not to replace or interfere with them.
International Guidelines,
Acts and Regulations
UN
Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods.
Model Regulations
The United Nations Model Regulations on the
Transport of Dangerous Goods provide a basis for development of
harmonized regulations for all modes of transport, in order to facilitate
trade and the safe, efficient transport of hazardous materials.
The UN Model Regulations is in its 13th edition and is the basis
for most international, regional, national and modal transportation
regulations. The UN Model Regulations enhance safety, improve enforcement
capability, ease training requirements and enhance global trade
and economic development. Safety is enhanced primarily because harmonized
requirements simplify the complexity of the regulations, simplify
training efforts, and decrease the likelihood of non-compliance.
The Model Regulations provide economic benefits by eliminating the
costs of complying with a multitude of differing national, regional
and modal regulations. The UN Model Regulations facilitate compatibility
between modal requirements so that a consignment may be transported
by more than one mode without intermediate reclassification, marking,
labeling or repackaging.
Convention
concerning International Carriage by Rail - COTIF
The transport of passengers and goods by rail
is subject to the provisions of the Convention concerning International
Carriage by Rail of 9 May 1990 (COTIF).
This Convention has two Appendices, one dealing with the carriage
of passengers (CIV
Uniform Rules) and the other dealing with the carriage of goods
(CIM
Uniform Rules).
The
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety
The Office of Hazardous Materials Safety,
which is within the United States Department of Transportation's
Research and Special Programs Administration, is responsible for
coordinating a national safety program for the transportation of
hazardous materials by air, rail, highway and water, where comprehensive
guidance on the subject can be found.
Links and Sources
Relief
web, part of the UN
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
The
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
AFP
BBC
News
CNN
News
UNEP
Chemicals Programme
OECD
Chemical Safety Department
If you want to send us your comments, please e-mail
us at: apell@unep.fr
|